Regional Airports as Two-Sided Markets – the Case for a More Economic Approach in the Application of the EU’s State Aid Rules
Nov 29th, 2009 | By WJ | Category: Air Law & Policy, Lead storyby Andreas Knorr and André W. Heinemann 
With its landmark ruling of December 17th, 2008, the European Union's Court of First Instance (CFI) unexpectedly declared the European Commission's famous Charleroi decision of early 2004 nil and void. On February 19th, 2009, the Commission decided not to appeal. The nullification of the Commission's Charleroi decision by the CFI on purely formal grounds is just the culmination in a long-standing series of legal fights between traditional airlines and their low-cost competitors over (allegedly) unfair competition through (alleged) state aids. However, it has opened a rare window of opportunity for embarking on a much-needed, more economic approach in the EU's state aids control procedures. In this paper, we will apply the theory of two-sided markets – so-called platforms – to this famous case as we deem it particularly fit to advance the economic analysis of the complex commercial relationships between airports and airlines.
Similar content:
- How Sustainable is Emirates’ Business Model?
- The Regional Impact of Airports: How Can We Measure It?
- 3.4 – Regional Airports: Quality versus Quantity
- 2.6 – Aircraft Noise – Disturbance, Perception and Policy Implications at Regional Airports
- Consumer Demand Theory and Regional Air-Travel: an Integrated Economic & Econometric Approach (PhD thesis)
- The Quality of Life in Airport Regions – How to Sustain a Good Marriage
- 3.5 – Spatial implications of Airport Policy for Regional Airports: A sustainable Future?
